Re: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in progress on VLAN/Priority Draft

["Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>]

Emile van Bergen <openradius-radextwg@e-advies.nl> wrote:
> I find it incomprehensible that the DIAMETER format would not need any
> evaluation against the alternatives on the merits, but that people can
> just wave their hands and say, there's already some diameter parsing
> code in many RADIUS server's that support TTLS in some form or other, so
> hey, 'tis the only sensible road ahead.

  s/only/proven working, implemented, deployed, and functional/

  If there are other alternatives, they should be explored, of course.
But the diameter format, while wasteful of space in the RADIUS packet,
*is* a proven one.

  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>