- add sentence "This counter wraps from the maximum value to
zero and is
reset upon system (re)initialization." for all counters of type
Counter32
Mmm... the "wraps from the max value to zero" is redundant, because
that is the behaviour of every Counter32 and Counter64. That is
already specified in RFC2578.
W.r.t "is reset upon system (re)initialization", that is not exactly
waht we wanted either. I do not know what you mean with "reset".
It is not REQUIRED that counter reset to sero (if that is what you mean).
They MAY do so, butnot required.
I think what you want to write is:
This counter will only experience a discuntinuity when the system
(re)starts as indicated by the value of sysUpTime.
- remove ref to IANA copyright.
thanks
- some minor formatting (line breaks in the mib)
OK
My comments to the other 4 mib docs (2618bis etc) also apply for
your use of InetAddress and InetAddressType. I know I did say (in my point 3)
last time that this was acceptable for Informational RFC. But now that I
reviewed the other MIB modules and now that I am asking for the below
updates tyo those, it would be best to do so too for these 2
modules, in order to be consistent for all RADIUS related MIB modules.
So pls translate the following to your own objects and consider to
make similar changes:
- radiusAuthServerInetAddress OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IP address of the RADIUS authentication
server referred to in this table entry, using
the version neutral IP address format."
::= { radiusAuthServerExtEntry 3 }
according to RFC4001, you MUST specify which object of SYNTAX
InetAddressType controls the format of this object. I t is clear
which one it is, b ut it would be good to add that.
- radiusAuthClientServerInetPortNumber
According to RFC4001, you must specify what the value zero means
for this object.
- for this one
radiusAuthClientExtMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for authentication
clients implementing the RADIUS Authentication
Client IPv6 Extensions MIB. Implementation of
this module is for entities that support IPv6,
or support IPv4 and IPv6."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusAuthClientExtMIBGroup }
::= { radiusAuthClientMIBCompliances 2 }
I think it would be better to do:
radiusAuthClientExtMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for authentication
clients implementing the RADIUS Authentication
Client IPv6 Extensions MIB. Implementation of
this module is for entities that support IPv6,
or support IPv4 and IPv6."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusAuthClientExtMIBGroup }
OBJECT radiusAuthServerInetAddressType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
DESCRIPTION
"An implementation is only required to support IPv4 and
globally unique IPv6 addresses."
OBJECT radiusAuthServerInetAddress
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(4|16))
DESCRIPTION
"An implementation is only required to support IPv4 and
globally unique IPv6 addresses."
Bert
I tried a diff but that output is rather messy, so I sent you the
complete drafts.
Thanks,
Stefaan
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>