[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. User-Priority-Table does only
affect the port-based priority settings and is not enforced on a
per-user or per-session basis.
MS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:07 AM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio (ProCurve); Bernard Aboba;
> radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
>
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> another issue that came to my mind again was raised during
> the discussion with Bernard is that the User-Priority-Table
> is used for remapping of user priorities only according to
> the User Priority Regeneration table. The conclusion of our
> discussion was that your draft does not aim to attemp to
> associate the actual data traffic with the QoS classes.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> > Hi Mauricio,
> >
> > thanks for responding to this issue. Please find my response below:
> >
> >>>> your new text proposal looks much better.
> >>>>
> >>>> You need to modify Section 3 as well:
> >>>>
> >>>> "
> >>>> Access- Access- Access- Access- CoA-
> >>>> Request Accept Reject Challenge Req # Attribute
> >>>> 0 0-1 0 0 0-1 TBD
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> User-Priority-Table
> >>>
> >>>> "
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Got it. BTW, do you think that *any* of the attributes are
> >>> appropriate for inclusion in an Accounting-Request?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> An argument to allow these attributes in an
> Accounting-Request is for
> >> forensic purposes. The accounting server is already aggregating a
> >> number of session characteristics (packet/byte counts) and allowing
> >> attributes from the vlan draft would shed additional light
> on the what
> >> specific services the user was consuming/using at a given
> point in time.
> >
> > Assume that you carry the User-Priority-Table within
> Accounting-Request
> > messages. Do you think that it provides information how
> many packets are
> > carried for each individual QoS class? Where is the
> information that
> > offers me the following info:
> > - # packets/bytes for user priority 0
> > ....
> > - # packets/bytes for user priority 7
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> MS
> >
> >
>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>