Issue 190: Relationship of Tunnel and Egress-VLAN attributes

["Sanchez, Mauricio (ProCurve)" <mauricio.sanchez@hp.com>]

Bernard,

I'm satisfied with the modification made to section 2.1.  However, I
also asked that a similar statement be added to section 2.3.  This would
remove any possibility of ambiguity.

MS  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 7:42 AM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Conclusion of WG last call on VLAN/Priority Document
> 
> RADEXT WG last call has concluded on the VLAN/Priority 
> document, draft-ietf-radext-vlan-03.txt.
> 
> Three issues were raised: 189, 190, 191.  The issues and 
> their resolutions are availalble here:
> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> 
> Based on the resolutions, an -04 document has been submitted, 
> and the IESG has been requested to start IETF last call, as 
> part of considering the document for publication as a 
> Proposed Standard.
> 
> Until the -04 draft shows up on the archive, it is available here:
> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/draft-ietf-radext-vlan-04.txt
> 
> Any issues submitted after this point will be handled as part 
> of IETF last call.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>