Moving forward on the NAS-Filter-Rule document

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

Recently a conference call took place relating to the next steps for the 
NAS-Filter-Rule document.  The new proposal for moving forward is as 
follows:

1. Have DIME WG commit to defining a new diameter AVP that replicates the 
nas-traffic-rule attribute.  The filter syntax would be exactly the same, 
thereby allowing the draft-ietf-radext-filter-rule to claim interoperability 
in terms of direct translation.  Diameter's IPFilterRule is not altered.

2. Have RADEXT WG commit to define a new RADIUS attribute that replicates 
IPFilterRule.  The ongoing work with nas-traffic-rule continues.

Discussion/feedback is solicited on this new proposal.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>