With respect to the Dynamic RADIUS MIBs, it may in fact be preferable to issue a new draft version, and first run the revisions through an SMIv2 syntax checker. I'll defer to the preference of the authors in this regard, but it seemed that's what they had suggested.
Indeed, 2 changes in the MIB have to be done and (moving discontinuity counter from scalar inside the table and a small SYNTAX update), so it looks to me best to update the draft. (see https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2006/msg00534.html) for the details. Also a very small change in an RFC ed note has to be done.
Is it Ok to resubmit the new versions now? regards, Stefaan -- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>