[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Request for Review: NAS-Filter-Rule Specification
- To: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: Request for Review: NAS-Filter-Rule Specification
- From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:11:24 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=gwz@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=914; t=1151396019; x=1152260019; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1001; h=From:Subject; d=cisco.com; i=gwz@cisco.com; z=From:=22Glen=20Zorn=20\(gwz\)=22=20<gwz@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20Request=20for=20Review=3A=20=20NAS-Filter-Rule=20Specification; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DQS867s+sFBXhaLj2FtDentWQxcA=3D; b=B7Yhp++31FLYgrzKXTbSxLB9Fw4PBX/1qhSpO5hycBYEl+ONgG6hUxKeVeMwCno3Rq60VU9c IrTEy9pTfpdTTSq+H7e3aub4ydWBbMm2b7GrJr6b2RxV/oiRuRZvCKez;
Bernard Aboba <> supposedly scribbled:
> As noted in the message below, it has been proposed that the RADEXT
> WG issue a document enabling use of the NAS-Filter-Rule defined in
> RFC 4005 within RADIUS, while at the same continuing work on the
> NAS-Traffic-Rule attribute:
> http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2006/msg00560.html
>
> A document specifying the NAS-Filter-Rule attribute is now available
> for
> inspection:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-filter-00.txt
>
> Please review this document and post comments to the list.
Quick note: it appears that the minimum length of this attribute is actually 35 (Type+Length+"deny in 1 from 1.2.3.4 to 2.3.4.5"), rather than 3 as stated in section 2.
Hope this helps,
~gwz
Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>