[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: The RADIUS attribute space: an assessment



Mauricio said:

Wasn't there a draft previously that talked to making the RADIUS message
format a bit more Diameter-like?  What happened to that draft?  Maybe that
could be used as a beginning for this problem?

There were two proposals that were discussed:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-wolff-radext-ext-attribute-00.txt
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-mitton-diameter-radius-vsas-01.txt

Here are pointers to other proposals that have been made over the years:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-00.txt
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-tjoens-aaa-radius-00.txt

I assume you're about to propose that this general problem be a WG work item?

It is already on the charter:

Oct 2006    RADIUS Extended Attributes submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>