[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The RADIUS attribute space: an assessment
- To: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>, "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
- Subject: RE: The RADIUS attribute space: an assessment
- From: "Greg Weber \(gdweber\)" <gdweber@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:50:35 -0400
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; header.From=gdweber@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1181; t=1151445037; x=1152309037; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=gdweber@cisco.com; z=From:=22Greg=20Weber=20\(gdweber\)=22=20<gdweber@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20The=20RADIUS=20attribute=20space=3A=20an=20assessment=20; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dzi21PJ2ppE7rMqtnrpQyN+1/eIQ=3D; b=BcVvUz85BDgIqhT8SKtZVO7B5xFLsA8B2RgF+iQSpK0XRO/1qWw8x8mRKTX8BJ5jrgpXM5pc NzkvTILONFAA4fvK6bCkeb2lv1CY+cwxbVzGv0OH6G5PtIZ837FdstF8;
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:16 PM
> To: Nelson, David
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: The RADIUS attribute space: an assessment
>
<snip>
> And for the vendors that do implement Diameter in a SW upgrade, ask
> them about their experience with customer uptake on *any* new version.
> Some people are happily running images 5 years out of date. This
> minimizes the potential market for Diameter even more.
>
> The main market I've seen is new deployments in telecom
> environments. There's a lot of money, but few boxes, and zero impact
> on the rest of the world. ISP's, enterprises, and the overwhelming
> majority of AAA deployments find it too hard to deploy Diameter.
Hi Alan,
Do you have any more info about what makes Diameter
difficult to deploy? Is it security setup? config changes?
Or just that any change at all is difficult?
Is Diameter more difficult to deploy than IPsec protected
RADIUS? More difficult than RADIUS with CoA?
Greg
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>