RE: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

I think we should not allow to pack more then one Filter Rule in a
single attribute.

A Filter Rule should be allowed to overflow (span) more then one
attribute.

If you have more then one filter rules in a packet with some filter
rules overflowing, how can you tell when a new one begins?

A filter rule always starts with an action: permit or deny.  These words
do not appear anywhere else in the rule.  Therefore a Filter Atribute
that starts with a permit or deny must be a new filter rule.

What is wrong with that?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting
> 
> Do we have a conclusion from this thread?  If so, can someone 
> state what they think it is?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>