[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66

To: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
From: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:57:42 -0700
In-reply-to: <BAY106-F21662EEB376D6FBBDC91B9936B0@phx.gbl>

 

> 
> In your reply to this message, please state whether you 
> support the consensus described below, or whether you 
> disagree with it (and if so, how).
>

I support this consensus position.  In particular I support the
simplified approach proposed by Lior.  

Paul

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
  - From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>

References:
- Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
  - From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: paradox
Next by Date: Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Next by thread: Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread