[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue

To: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Subject: Re: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:00:40 -0400
Cc: isms@ietf.org, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:52:09 EDT." <3CFB564E055A594B82C4FE89D2156560219388@MABOSEVS2.ets.enterasys.com>

"Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com> wrote:
> Uh, something like that.  Actually, in the NAS-Management draft we
> recommend that the Service-Type attribute be "Framed-Management" and the
> (new) Framed-Management-Protocol attribute be "SNMPv3".  I think that
> this is much cleaner than overloading the NAS-Port-Type.

  I agree.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
  - From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
Next by Date: RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
Previous by thread: RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
Next by thread: RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread