[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
- To: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>, <isms@ietf.org>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [Isms] RE: Follow up on Authorize Only issue
- From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:59:16 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; header.From=gwz@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=477; t=1153857558; x=1154721558; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=gwz@cisco.com; z=From:=22Glen=20Zorn=20\(gwz\)=22=20<gwz@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20[Isms]=20RE=3A=20Follow=20up=20on=20Authorize=20Only=20issue; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dj5JHVHOkk4k+d3Gjk+Lsn4+lNFg=3D; b=CIauXJd4fFcXH8B3npHRsp06F8M+laJNTK6McTkf+ylSU1UIIGIqoys30QlRwjFhAiMQ/Z1I 2SReONVKEQrT3IIkJ0IxjMO5lnJNyzEPEIjDyw/dRWnDHHhnv7oOZPqF;
Nelson, David <mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com> supposedly scribbled:
...
>
> There was also a suggestion on the list that the NAS convey the
> asserted identity to the RADIUS Server for audit purposes. This
> could be accomplished by a (new) Asserted-Identity attribute.
How would this be different than the User-Name attribute?
~gwz
Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply
listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>