RE: [Isms] Summary of Authorize Only issue

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:15 PM
> To: isms@ietf.org; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Isms] Summary of Authorize Only issue
> 
> Dave Harrington writes...
> 
> > I think "SNMP over SSH" would be appropriate. I do not see 
> a reason to 
> > limit it to SNMPv3.
> 
> That's fine by me, if that's the consensus.  In the past, 
> I've been encouraged to omit support for v1 and v2c in I-Ds, 
> as those versions have been deprecated.  The comment was from 
> Bert Wijnen, in relation to protocol selection attributes I'd 
> included for v1 and v2c in the NAS-Management draft.
> 

I believe that that recommendation was correct and continues to stand.
The name does not bother me too much, as SNMPv3 is the only standard
version of SNMP but defining special attributes or features for v1 and
v2c should need some strong argumentation. 

Dan


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>