re: Define some new NAS-Port-Type

["CTO YAN Renxiang" <Renxiang.Yan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>]

Hi, David and Bernard,

Thanks for your comments.

I think stating as work in progress in Informative Reference is ok. Many RFC documents 
are also written in this way, as follows,

5.2 Informative References

[802.20]	Mobile Broadband Wireless Access (MBWA), IEEE Standard, Work in Progress.

[802.22]	Wireless Regional Area Networks (WRAN), IEEE Standard, Work in Progress.

How do you think about that?

BTW, do you think we need to define a NAS-Port-Type for 802.15 (WPAN) also? 

Renxiang


> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2006年8月2日 9:04
> 收件人: dnelson@enterasys.com; CTO YAN Renxiang; 
> radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> 主题: RE: Define some new NAS-Port-Type
> 
> 
> >I understand the
> >difficulty of referencing draft IEEE standards, so I'm not 
> sure exactly
> >what to suggest as an alternative.
> 
> I think they can reference IEEE 802 work-in-progress as an 
> Informative 
> Reference.
> 
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>