[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Glen's proposal for Attribute Extension

I also think that maybe we want to not use the VSA attribute type (26)
for this purpose.

One of the motivations for this proposal was that it could be implemented 
with no change to code on existing RADIUS servers, because a single octet 
extended type was used, making it compatible with the VSA format suggested 
in RFC 2865.  Given that, why would the attribute type need to be changed?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>