[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely specified



I agree that the behavior should be specified.  It would seem that this
is an opportunity to take advantage of Diameter's M-bit in governing
the gateway's behavior.

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote:
> Description of issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely
> specified
> Submitter name: Glen Zorn
> Submitter email address: gwz@cisco.com
> Date first submitted: 26 Aug 06
> Document: draft-ietf-radext-filter-01.txt
> Comment type: T
> Priority: 1
> Section: 4 
> Rationale/Explanation of issue: The last sentence of section 4 says
> "Note that since a Diameter AVP can be larger than the maximum RADIUS
> packet size (4096), translation from Diameter to RADIUS may not be
> possible in all cases."  While this is true, the behavior of the
> Diameter-RADIUS gateway in this case is left unspecified.  Is the
> response forwarded back toward the requests' originator without the
> untranslatable AVPs?  In the case of an Access-Accept message, Section
> 1.2 says "If a NAS conforming to this specification receives an
> Access-Accept packet containing a NAS-Filter-Rule attribute which it
> cannot apply, it MUST act as though it had received an Access-Reject.",
> it might be reasonable for the gateway to translate the Access-Accept
> into an Access-Reject, since an attribute that is missing because
> untranslatable can obviously not be applied.  In the case of a CoA
> message with an untranslatable attribute, should the message be
> translated into a Disconnect-Request or just discarded?  Or in both
> cases, should the gateway respond to the originating/responding Diameter
> peer with an appropriate error (e.g., DIAMETER_INVALID_AVP_LENGTH) and
> let it figure out the next step?  If so, it still seems that the peers
> behavior must be specified.

-- 
Barney Wolff         I never met a computer I didn't like.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>