[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely specified
- To: "Barney Wolff" <barney@databus.com>
- Subject: RE: Issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely specified
- From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:45:00 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-4.cisco.com; header.From=gwz@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=360; t=1156625102; x=1157489102; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=gwz@cisco.com; z=From:=22Glen=20Zorn=20\(gwz\)=22=20<gwz@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20Issue=3A=20Diameter-RADIUS=20gateway=20behavior=20not=20complete ly=20specified; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dm7E3Pmh6ma+lb09sBcSrQ2HAMMo=3D; b=aWccMlyNyw5Dwty8k2y/YzhmpClMNMIPgrb8XU8E2jFTI89t7f5l+/Fjd8ke5+7FqZKj53ka UIoZnAXrQiaZHUtsOAYNdYg1OHeOHOlv1xQ8VMgRKHf73MVKU+Jzn7oL;
Barney Wolff <mailto:barney@databus.com> scribbled on Saturday, August
26, 2006 12:34 PM:
> I agree that the behavior should be specified. It would seem that
> this is an opportunity to take advantage of Diameter's M-bit in
> governing the gateway's behavior.
Not sure how the M-bit helps. Can you elaborate?
...
Hope this helps,
~gwz
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>