[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RADIUS attribute extension formats: Do we understand the proposals?

To: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RADIUS attribute extension formats: Do we understand the proposals?
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:05:35 -0400
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:08:02 PDT." <BAY106-F18C98E3E8AF1B0E7F787CA93180@phx.gbl>

> In previous mailing list discussion, we have discussed two major proposals 
> for RADIUS attribute extension.  This message attempts to summarize the two 
> proposals.  Additions/corrections/comments welcome.
> 
> 
> 1. Glen + David's proposal:

  I have no objections to this proposal.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RADIUS attribute extension formats: Do we understand the proposals?
  - From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed Resolution to Issue 198: Attribute Concatenation/Splitting
Next by Date: Re: Proposed Resolution to Issue 198: Attribute Concatenation/Splitting
Previous by thread: RADIUS attribute extension formats: Do we understand the proposals?
Next by thread: RE: RADIUS attribute extension formats: Do we understand the proposals?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread