[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document

To: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:02:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <20061018144136.GA26737@web1>

Emile van Bergen writes...

> Not for NAS-Filter-Rule's basic function as a transport mechanism
> for a single rule set, no.

Does anyone see the need for tagged sets of rules, in the same vein that
we have tagged sets of tunnel attributes, i.e. as alternative sets of
rules?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
  - From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

References:
- Re: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
  - From: Emile van Bergen <openradius-radextwg@e-advies.nl>

Prev by Date: RE: Filter Separation using a NULL?
Next by Date: RE: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
Previous by thread: Re: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
Next by thread: RE: Request for Review: RADIUS Filter Attribute Document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread