Re: Filter Separation using a NULL?

["Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>]

"Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:
...

  I would say:

      The String field is one or more octets.  It contains filter rules
      in the IPFilterRule syntax defined in [RFC3588] Section 4.3, with
      individual filter rules separated by a NULL (0x00). A 
      NAS-Filter-Rule attribute may contain a partial rule, one rule,
      or more than one rule.  Filter rules may be continued across
      attribute boundaries, so implementations cannot assume that
      individual filter rules begin or end on attribute boundaries.

      The set of NAS-Filter-Rule attributes SHOULD be created by
      concatenating the individual filter rules, separated by a NULL
      (0x00) character.  The resulting data should be split on 252
      byte boundaries to obtain a set of NAS-Filter-Rule attributes.
      On reception, the individual filter rules SHOULD be determined
      by concatenating the contents of all NAS-Filter-Rule attributes,
      and then splitting the resulting data at the NULL (0x00) characters.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>