[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed Resolution to RFC 3576bis Issue 132: Must Proxy-State be Copied by NAS?

> The text of issue 132 is enclosed below.  The proposed resolution is to add 
> the following text to Section 3.2:

  To resolve the first question raised in the issue, I would change
the text to add "or NAS"

"      If there are any Proxy-State Attributes in a Disconnect-Request or
      CoA-Request received from the server, the forwarding proxy or NAS
      MUST include those Proxy-State Attributes in its response to the
      server.

      A forwarding proxy or NAS MUST NOT modify existing Proxy-State,
      State, or Class Attributes present in the packet.  The
      forwarding proxy or NAS MUST treat any Proxy-State attributes
      already in the packet as opaque data.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>