Re: Status of draft-yan-radext-port-type-01.txt

[Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>]

Thank you for the information.  

It would be very much appreciated if NAS-Port-Type for 802.16 is
quickly assigned in the RADEXT chairs' recommended way, because IEEE
802.21 specification has some dependency on NAS-Port-Type values.

Best Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba


On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:36:21AM -0500, Nelson, David wrote:
> Yoshihiro Ohba writes...
> 
> > What is the status of this I-D?
> > 
> > I think I-D is important because it defines NAS-Port-Type
> > for several new wireless technologies including 802.16.
> 
> I'm still working on the minutes of the RADEXT WG session at IETF-67,
> however, the discussion of this document in the meeting can be
> summarized as follows:
> 
> -- The proposal to register new code points for the NAS-Port-Type
> attribute in the RADIUS IANA registry is fine.
> 
> -- This attribute does not require a published specification.  We can
> save the cost of publishing an RFC.
> 
> -- The recommendation of the WG Chairs was to submit a request to IANA
> for the assignment, and the RADEXT Chairs will work with IANA to see
> that any necessary expert review is provided.
> 
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>