Re: ISSUE 107: proposed resolution text: CORRECTION

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

I think this resolution is generally OK.

Change "massage" to "message".
Also change "NAS is not overloaded" to "NAS, network and RADIUS server are 
not overloaded".

Alan DeKok said:

 The previous message quoted text from an earlier version of the
document in error.  The following text is the correct version.

S.s.s.  Interim-Accounting-Interval

  [RFC2869] Section 2.1 states:

     It is also possible to statically configure an interim value on
     the NAS itself. Note that a locally configured value on the NAS
     MUST override the value found in an Access-Accept.

  This requirement may be phrased too strongly.  It is conceivable that
  a NAS implementation has a setting for a "minimum" value of Interim-
  Accounting-Interval, based on resource constraints in the NAS, and
  network loading in the local environment of the NAS.  In such cases,
  the value administratively provisioned in the NAS should not be over-
  ridden by a smaller value from an Access-Accept massage. The NAS's
  value could be over-ridden by a larger one, however.  The intent is
  that the NAS sends accounting information at fixed intervals, short
  enough such that the potential loss of billable revenue is limited,
  but also that the accounting updates are infrequent enough such that
  the NAS is not overloaded.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>