[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)

To: gwz@cisco.com
Subject: RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:14:32 -0700
Bcc:
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org, iana-prot-param-comment@icann.org
In-reply-to: <4C0FAAC489C8B74F96BEAD85EAEB262503DE4E8C@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>

Anyway, it looks like the right answer is that Tunnel-Type andTunnel-Medium-Type are allocated as specified in RFC 2868, not 3575.


Glen Zorn said:

I stand corrected.




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
  - From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>

References:
- RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
  - From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
Next by Date: RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
Previous by thread: RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
Next by thread: RE: Request for allocation of Tunnel-Type value (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread