RE: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-radext-fixes

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

> The issue with the original text above is that if sounds like it is a
> clarification of RFC2865, but RFC2865 (in my reading) doesn't contain
> anything substantial on the issue of retransmission timer management.

Correct.

> If the WG has consensus to more clearly specify this mechanism (which
> I assume it does, because the issue included in the -fixes draft)
> what's currently there isn't sufficient.

OK. I think that the text proposed to resolve this DISCUSS is fine using the
RECCOMMENDED keyword.  This is an issue with deployments, and as a
recommended practice it would be useful to provide a complete specification.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>