[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Revisions to RFC 4005
Glen Zorn writes...
> Right, so what I'm suggesting is that whatever Diameter-related
> issues there might be w/the extended attributes should be addressed
> in the extended attributes document...
Yes.
> ...while another small document ... should address the general
> problem w/VSA translation...
That sounds reasonable. That work might be undertaken in the DIME WG as an
update to RFC 4005, for example. Or not. :-)
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>