Re: Request for review: Design Guidelines Document

["Greg Weber" <gdweber@gmail.com>]

Went through the current version of the doc.  Looks pretty clean to me.
No substantive comments to add to those from Bernard, Dave & Glen.

I did like Bernard's suggestion of adding a 'checklist' appendix.  Of
course, the danger being that people would *only* read the checklist -
so, I think it would need to be fairly thorough.  I also like the new
organization of the text.

Greg


On 9/6/07, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:
> An updated version of the Design Guidelines document has been posted to the
> IETF archive:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-design-00.txt
>
> Pease formally review the document to determine if it is ready or WGLC.
> Comments should be sent to this list using the format described in the
> RADEXT Issues tracker: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
>
> This review period will last until October 5, 2007.  At that time issues
> raised on the list will be resolved.  Once all issues are addressed we will
> start WGLC on the document.
>
>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>