[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

Glen Zorn wrote:
> It hasn't changed yet, I was proposing to change it in order to provide
> greatly enhanced functionality.

  I was under the impression that the WG had mostly achieved consensus
on the format.

> How about this: leave the extra octet in there, but mark it as
> "Reserved", so at least it will be there for future use?

  If that's the proposal, then I prefer the Diameter AVP format.  It is
simpler, more flexible, and does not require the introduction of yet
another incompatible VSA format.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>