Re: [ANCP] mboned multiaa-framework reflecting the ancp framework draft, request for review

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>]

Are you subscribed to DIME or RADEXT?
If not, then it might have just disappeared with the rest of the spam

Hiroaki Sato wrote:
> Hi Bernard and Hannes,
>
> Our response is listed in the mboned archive but I don't see it 
> RADEXT:it may be rejected.
> Please see 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned/current/msg00375.html
> I'll resend it to RADEXT ML.
> Should I send it to Diameter ML, too?
>
> Thank you,
> Hiroaki
>
> > Thank you for telling me.
> > We reflected RADEXT comments recieved from Alan. It seems like 
> > http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2007/msg00659.html.
> > And I replied to radiusext@ops.ietf.org on 2007/11/26.
> > Actually, most of comments were reflected to -05 version.
> > I'll check it once more.
> >
> > Hiroaki
> >
> > > I agree with Hannes.
> > >
> > > So far I have not seen any response on the RADEXT WG mailing list to 
> > > the review of this document:
> > > http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2007/msg00659.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:30 PM
> > > To: <mboned@ietf.org>
> > > Cc: "Hiroaki Sato" <satou.hiroaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; "Romascanu, Dan 
> > > (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>; <thayashi@digitalforest.co.jp>; 
> > > <christian.jacquenet@francetelecom.com>; 
> > > <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>; <dime@ietf.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [ANCP] mboned multiaa-framework reflecting the ancp 
> > > framework draft, request for review
> > >
> > > > Scott Bradner asked us a while ago to review your AAA framework draft.
> > > > http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2007/msg00528.html
> > > >
> > > > We at DIME did an initial review. You can find it here:
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg02007.html
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg01912.html
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg01899.html
> > > >
> > > > I recall that there were also reviews from the RADEXT working group.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see these reviews being addressed.
> > > >
> > > > I am also puzzled why the DIME and the RADEXT working group aren't 
> > > > get consulted more involved given that this is clearly about the 
> > > > AAA interworking.
> > > >
> > > > Ciao
> > > > Hannes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hiroaki Sato wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > We, the authors of draft-ietf-mboned-multiaaa-framework-06.txt, 
> > > > > revised
> > > > > our draft and some items refer to the ancp framework draft.
> > > > > So, we'd like to request for you to review our draft and please 
> > > > > comment
> > > > > on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Major changes include:
> > > > > -two levels of accounting information (start/stop only and plus 
> > > > > volume)
> > > > > -acconting for fast channel change (information merging)
> > > > > -QoS downgrade (admission control)
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you,
> > > > > Hiroaki
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > ************************************
> > > > > NTT Network Service Systems Lab.
> > > > > Hiroaki Sato
> > > > > TEL:0422-59-4683 (+81-422-59-4683)
> > > > > FAX:0422-59-5636 (+81-422-59-5636)
> > > > > ************************************
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ANCP mailing list
> > > > > ANCP@ietf.org
> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>