[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RADEXT WG re-charter



Hi,

Wow.  Silence.  I have to wonder if the RADEXT WG mailing list server is
broken, or all the RADEXT WG members are on vacation.  BTW, infer nothing
from the date on which this message was issued.   This is a serious
proposal, not an April Fool's joke. :-)

Discussion, please?

I'm on vacation indeed :-)

The proposed text surpasses my expectations. I would have been fine with just taking out the one dash about no new transports. This new text also "fixes" the questions like "Why is DTLS not against the charter, being a new security mechanism?", which have been asked in the past several times, including at IETF-71. The new text has more "truth in advertising" in that respect.

The proposed time frame of March 2009 looks plausible to me.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>