FW: [Isms] What granularity of attributes do we need for the secure transport?

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:47 PM
> To: David B. Nelson
> Cc: isms@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Isms] What granularity of attributes do we need for
> the secure transport?
> 
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:57:27PM -0400, David B. Nelson wrote:
> 
> > What do others think about this decision point?
> >
> > -- Do we need only an abstract security level assertion?
> >
> > -- Do we need the transport protocol name?
> >
> > -- Do we need the transport protocol version?
> >
> > -- Do we need any further details of security parameters?
> 
> As technical contributor, I like the abstract security level
> assertion. More granular control can be achieved by means of
> configuration of the SNMP engine or secure transport protocol.
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>