[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter

To: "'Bernard Aboba'" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "'Romascanu, Dan $Dan$'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "'Alan DeKok'" <aland@deployingradius.com>
Subject: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:19:49 +0700
Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <BLU137-W3582AC60B8DE34F3A13CD93EA0@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU137-DS3201313A440BD95347E3B93E80@phx.gbl> <01c201c89e64$259ca440$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <001601c89ea3$12f2f7b0$33da787c@arubanetworks.com> <200804150800.53961.stefan.winter@restena.lu> <004001c89ed0$d8b0f100$33da787c@arubanetworks.com> <48046B45.20008@deployingradius.com> <007501c89f8c$57c0f380$99e0787c@arubanetworks.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04B082B7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <BLU137-W3582AC60B8DE34F3A13CD93EA0@phx.gbl>

Bernard Aboba <mailto:bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> scribbled on Wednesday,
April 16, 2008 2:16 PM:

> For transport items this basically means "uses RADIUS packet
> formats defined in RFC 2865, 2866 and 5176" (although the
> ports can be different).

So what you're saying is that two nodes can be unable to communicate &
still be "backward compatible"?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>

References:
- Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by Date: RE: RADEXT WG re-charter
Previous by thread: Re: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by thread: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread