[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter

To: "'Stefan Winter'" <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
Subject: RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:50:27 +0700
Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200804251435.58191.stefan.winter@restena.lu>
References: <BLU137-DS3201313A440BD95347E3B93E80@phx.gbl> <8A8CFE8F89C38B41A749C19328C76D63038852B0B6@exchange02.bridgewatersys.com> <000f01c8a04c$ce894380$9ae4787c@arubanetworks.com> <200804251435.58191.stefan.winter@restena.lu>

Stefan Winter <mailto:stefan.winter@restena.lu> scribbled on Friday,
April 25, 2008 7:36 PM:

...

> 
> - using (D)TLS to secure the payload
> 
> (where I would hope that DTLS and TLS have enough similarities
> to warrant being put into one document. Not sure about that though.)

Personally, I'd much prefer keeping these things neatly separated.

...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>

Prev by Date: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter) to Pr
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by thread: RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread