RE: Summary: Consensus call on RADEXT WG re-charter

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

...

> one suggested correction: over the course of the discussion,
> it seemed that splitting TCP transport into an own document
> was deemed worthwhile.
> 
> Such a document should be added to the milestones. Since the
> document probably makes use of Status-Server, and the TCP+TLS
> work in turn uses the TCP transport document, it should have
> an intermediate place in the timeline. 

I agree.

...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>