Bernard
Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba@hotmail.com] writes:
This
is a request for review of the RADSEC specification for the purposes of
considering it for adoption as a RADEXT WG work item.
I'm a little confused: since the recently approved charter lists
RadSec as a work item (even calling it out by name: '…specifications for
Secure transports, including TCP/TLS (RADSEC) and UDP/DTLS'), I'm not sure what
the point of this is or what the alternatives might be…
The document is available for inspection here:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-winter-radsec-01.txt
Please respond to the mailing list, indicating whether your are IN FAVOR or
AGAINST adoption of the document as a RADEXT WG work item. If you have
comments on the document, please post these to the mailing list as well, in the
format described in the RADEXT WG Issues page:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
This request for review will conclude on June 16, 2008.