RE: RADEXT Issue 256 (NAS management Authorization)

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

David B. Nelson [mailto:d.b.nelson@comcast.net] writes:

> > Does it really matter?
> 
> If a protocol is no longer used, why bother include it in the list?

I'm sure somebody somewhere is using rcp (possibly even Kerberized) for
example, esp. if their NAS is *nix-based.  Why not?

> 
> > If they will be included in the list, just include them w/o editorial
> > comment...
> 
> Yeah, that sounds like good advice.
> 




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>