RE: [dhcwg] draft-lourdelet-radext-ipv6-dhcp-00 published

["Benoit Lourdelet (blourdel)" <blourdel@cisco.com>]

FYI,

This individual work will be included in a revision of RFC3162 that Glen
Zorn and I are going to work on.


Regards

Benoit

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Ralph Droms (rdroms)
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:23 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-lourdelet-radext-ipv6-dhcp-00 published

Correction.  On a link with no router advertisements you need to
configure any addresses and prefixes manually and separately.

There is no expectation that the prefix from an assigned address is
necessarily on the link.  On-link prefixes are independent from assigned
addresses.

- Ralph

On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:01 AM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
>> What about the scenario where there is no router in the network or 
>> not
> announcing router advertisement with prefix options? What length of 
> prefix the >DHCPv6 client should use for address assignment?
>
>> Best Regards,
>> 	Janos
>
>
>
> There is no provision in DHCPv6 to include prefix length in a message 
> to the client - I have said so several times to the DHCPv6 mailer.  
> Check the email archives.  In a router-less network, you are hosed.  
> You have to configure an address and prefix length manually.
>
> Hemant

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>