[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: REMINDER: RADEXT WG Last call on "Extended RADIUS Attributes"

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:10 PM
> To: 'Stefan Winter'
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: REMINDER: RADEXT WG Last call on "Extended 
> RADIUS Attributes"
> 
> Stefan Winter <mailto://stefan.winter@restena.lu> writes:
> 

...

> > There also is no clarification whether fragmenting should 
> only occur 
> > when it is needed. Without requiring this, a compliant 
> implementation 
> > could as well split the 5-byte data "Hello" into five fragments. I 
> > suggest to add a bit of wording to strongly discourage that.
> 
> Maybe just put a note like "If you are a total moron, stop 
> reading now." in the Abstract?
> 
> ...

There certainly should be some other ways to say it. 

Dan

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>