RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Bernard Aboba <mailto://aboba@internaut.com> writes:

...

> Looking at RFC 3588, it does seem
> that the agbility to name and define a Grouped AVP has some
> advantages.

OK, so I've run into a situation when working on a set of attributes for
WiMAX that just begs for a named, multi-TLV attribute.  I guess it does seem
that the extended attributes should be able to handle this situation, fixing
one of the inadequacies (IMHO) of legacy RADIUS attributes, but right now
they can't.  Any suggestions for fixing this problem (as painlessly as
possible :-)? 

...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>