RE: REMINDER: RADEXT WG Last call on "Extended RADIUS Attributes"

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Alan DeKok [mailto:aland@deployingradius.com] writes:

> Glen Zorn wrote:
> > Alright, how about this?
> >
> >    M (More)
> >
> >       The More Flag is one (1) bit in length and MUST be present.
> When
> >       a value to be transmitted exceeds 246 octets in length it is
> >       fragmented over two or more Extended Attributes.  If the More
> Flag
> >       is set (1), this indicates that the Value field of the Extended
> >       Attribute contains a fragment of a larger value, which is
> >       continued in the next Extended Attribute of the same Ext-Type.
> >       When the More Flag is clear (0), the final (or only) fragment
> of
> >       the value is contained in the Extended Attribute.  Any Extended
> > 	Attributes containing multiple fragments of the same value MUST
> be
> > 	in order and MUST be consecutive attributes in the packet.
> 
>   Looks good to me.

OK, cool.  I'll just change the last sentence to say "Any Extended
Attributes containing fragments of the same value MUST be in order and MUST
be consecutive attributes in the packet." because an Extended Attribute
can't contain multiple fragments (my bad ;-).

> 
>   Alan DeKok.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>