Um, 802.11 supports true mobility and roaming. Even before
802.11r was finished plenty of vendors have done pre-standard versions of
mobility.
But what does this have to do with RADIUS? There should be no
reason to have different attributes for .11 and .16, right?
-Matt
From: Ray Bell
[mailto:ray@grid-net.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:15 PM
To: Matt Holdrege; Bernard Aboba; Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve); Mike Bean;
David Nelson; radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Dan Romascanu
Subject: RE: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
True mobility and roaming…
From:
owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Matt Holdrege
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 1:44 AM
To: Bernard Aboba; Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve); Mike Bean; David Nelson;
radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Dan Romascanu
Subject: RE: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
I don’t see any reason why RADIUS should differentiate between
802.16 and 802.11 or any other 802.
-Matt
From:
owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Bernard Aboba
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 12:40 AM
To: Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve); Mike Bean; David Nelson;
radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Dan Romascanu
Subject: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
Some
questions have arisen about the format of the Calling-Station-Id Attribute when
used with WiMAX.
Since WiMAX is based on IEEE 802.16, and RFC 3580 applies to IEEE 802
technology, it would seem that the RFC 3580 Calling-Station-Id definition would
apply to WiMAX.
Are there reasons why this would not be the case?