[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFC 3580 Errata Submission

To: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:16:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <48CDFD5F.5050606@restena.lu>
Organization: Elbrys Networks, Inc.
References: <BLU137-DAV10BDD4AEAD454E319CAC5493510@phx.gbl> <1B1C064339C8406B8076795E1A788FB5@xpsuperdvd2> <48CDFD5F.5050606@restena.lu>

Stefan Winter writes...

> Further to this, neither the erratum nor this text here has a 
> normative wording as per 2119...

Well, first of all, the text I quoted from 802 is in the definitions
section.  I'm not sure that definitions call for the use of normative
keywords, and second, this is an IEEE 802 document and they don't use RFC
2119 keywords.  They tend to use "shall" where we would use "MUST", etc. 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
  - From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>

References:
- RFC 3580 Errata Submisssion
  - From: "Bernard Aboba" <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- Re: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
  - From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>

Prev by Date: Response to RADEXT WG review of <draft-ietf-mboned-multiaaa-framework-07.txt> (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
Next by thread: Re: RFC 3580 Errata Submission
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread