Re: Issue 272 resolution

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Glen Zorn wrote:
> With all due respect, have you read the draft & the issue?

  Yes.  The draft discusses 16-bit types.  Not 8 bit "extended" and
another 8-bit "tlv".  Issue 272 says that the attributes don't have an
"overall type".

  I don't know what an "overall type" is.  We already have "extended
types", so it can't be that.  Maybe data types?  But RADIUS doesn't
traditionally encode data types in the packet.  Maybe it's grouping...
but we already have tags for grouping.  Maybe it's sub-types, but I had
previously asked, and received a vague answer that could be interpreted
as "no".

  Maybe examples could help, rather than saying "type type type type" ?

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>