[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Status of Issue 225

To: "'Glen Zorn'" <glenzorn@comcast.net>, "'Alan DeKok'" <aland@deployingradius.com>, "'radext mailing list'" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Status of Issue 225
From: "Bernard Aboba" <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:06:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <001601c945e2$ab792ae0$026b80a0$@net>
References: <BLU137-W27AB3F1090DBDFB1041C38931C0@phx.gbl> <491C1028.5020806@deployingradius.com> <001601c945e2$ab792ae0$026b80a0$@net>

Glen Zorn said:

"This would disallow the presence of multiple AVPs in a single attribute.
Are you claiming "WG Consensus" for this massive change?"

Multiple AVPs can be included within a vendor-specific attribute today,
right?
Given that, it doesn't seem reasonable to change this.   




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Re: Status of Issue 225
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: Status of Issue 225
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Status of Issue 225
Next by Date: Re: Status of Issue 278
Previous by thread: RE: Status of Issue 225
Next by thread: Re: Status of Issue 225
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread