RE: Fwd: draft-ietf-radext-status-server-02 editorials (fwd)

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

Given that the intended scope of this draft is to document an implemented
but heretofore undocumented practice, it seems inappropriate that this draft
would Update any other RFCs, be they Standards Track or Informational.

In publishing this draft, the WG does not intend revise any aspects of the
RADIUS operational model.  We wish acknowledge what's been deployed, without
raising the status of that deployment so as to create defacto changes to the
de jure RADIUS protocol.  Perhaps it's a fine line to tread...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>