Re: I-D Action:draft-zorn-radius-pkmv1-03.txt

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Glen Zorn wrote:
> Using Extended Attributes was my first choice but it is unfortunately
> impossible to do this in any reasonable fashion using them; this was
> established as unchangeable WG Consensus some time ago, as announced by Alan
> Dekok 

  I never said any such thing.

  In the past, people rejected the modifications you proposed.  This
forms the "WG consensus" that I have referred to.

  In the present, no one has agreed to make those modifications.

  In the future, if people *do* agree to make those modifications, that
would form "WG consensus", and I would be in no position to oppose it.

> (it _is_ interesting that RFCs can be updated & made obsolete &
> decisions of even the highest courts may be overturned, all based on new
> data, but WG Consensus cannot change -- who knew?).

  These spurious claims can't avoid the fact that you haven't succeeded
in changing the WG consensus to support your position.  Don't blame me.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>