|
> > OK. The question still remains, though. If an attribute is only used in > > Accounting-Request packets, does the argument against complex > > attributes still apply? > > My preference would be to say yes, especially where the contents of > that attribute are interpreted by *later* policies on the server. Now that we have RFC 5176, accounting data can be kept as "state" that is later used to construct CoA/Disconnect-Requests. Is this what you mean? |