[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Open issues on the Crypto-Agility Requirements draft



> As I mentioned in the meeting, this is making a rather huge assumption about
> deployment issues over which the IETF has no control; in addition, the
> experience WRT Diameter security deployment is not especially encouraging.

My understanding is that many Diameter deployments use no security at all,
making them much *less* secure than RADIUS.

And these deployments are with NASes that are considerably more expensive
than a mass market access point. 

I'm not sure whether the issue is operational (too hard to configure) or
with the implementation. 

But something, somewhere, appears to have gone very wrong.