RE: REMINDER: Call for adoption of RADIUS for IPv6 Access Networks document as a WG work item

[Yungui Wang <w52006@huawei.com>]

Hello

Sorry for confusing you. 

I just want to say I have read this document. It is helpful for me
to work on some items such as multiple IPv6 access in the IP edge
which may need some of these attributes. Hence, I personally
support it is moved forward. In addition, I am willing to
contribute it too. :)

B.R.
Yungui
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes
Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:11 PM
> To: w52006@huawei.com; rnard_aboba@hotmail.com
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: REMINDER: Call for adoption of RADIUS for IPv6 
> Access Networks document as a WG work item
> 
> "Fine for me" means
> - "I don't care. Do whatever you want." 
> - "I am going to implement it into my AAA server."
> - "I am going to add it to my AAA clients."
> - "I am planning to deploy it."
> - "I will review the document." 
> - "I will contribute to it."
> - "Glen asked me to send a message and here is it."
> ? 
> 
> So, what do you mean by "fine for me"? 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> >[mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yungui Wang
> >Sent: 06 August, 2009 04:44
> >To: rnard_aboba@hotmail.com; rnard_aboba@hotmail.com
> >Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> >Subject: RE: REMINDER: Call for adoption of RADIUS for IPv6
Access 
> >Networks document as a WG work item
> >
> >Hello
> >
> >It is fine with me.
> >
> >B.R.
> >Yungui
> >
> >> 
> >> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> >[mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard
Aboba
> >> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 1:24 PM
> >> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> >> Subject: REMINDER: Call for adoption of RADIUS for IPv6
Access
> >Networks document as a WG work item
> >> 
> >>  
> >> 
> >> This is a reminder of an ongoing call for review of the
document
> >"RADIUS attributes for IPv6 Access Networks" for adoption as 
> a RADEXT 
> >WG work item.  This document is being targeted at Proposed
Standard 
> >status.
> >>  
> >> The document is available for review here:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lourdelet-radext-ipv6-access
> >> 
> >> This call for review will last until August 7, 2009.  Please
> >send email to the RADEXT WG mailing list indicating whether 
> you support 
> >adoption of this document as a RADEXT WG work item.  If you
have 
> >comments on the document, please also send these to the list in
the 
> >format described on the RADEXT WG Issues list:
> >> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >
> >--
> >to unsubscribe send a message to
> >radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' 
> in a single 
> >line as the message text body.
> >archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> >
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org
with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text
body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>